Birdwatch Note
2023-10-16 06:32:30 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
La première partie de la note suffisait. La seconde partie est de la spéculation, et le lien est un post faisait preuve également de spéculation.
Written by 99E23D7849DBF3F3E8556989EAF739BBAED78A2977E0FB87A069E1A2FD9D11C4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1713193941447630902
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1713805096075616378
- noteId - 1713805096075616378
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 99E23D7849DBF3F3E8556989EAF739BBAED78A2977E0FB87A069E1A2FD9D11C4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697437950523
- tweetId - 1713193941447630902
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- La première partie de la note suffisait. La seconde partie est de la spéculation, et le lien est un post faisait preuve également de spéculation.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-16 06:32:30 UTC (1697437950523) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-18 02:53:36 UTC (1697597616809) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |