Birdwatch Note
2023-10-15 20:51:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN hahaha why would you even suggest a note on it, people really use these notes like they are replies for no reason at all
Written by 2670680A9D0ECCF3DC0EB1C781837ABE0C5F7C83316B77D657746764B5191294
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1713604289195642911
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1713658758675767597
- noteId - 1713658758675767597
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2670680A9D0ECCF3DC0EB1C781837ABE0C5F7C83316B77D657746764B5191294 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697403060966
- tweetId - 1713604289195642911
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN hahaha why would you even suggest a note on it, people really use these notes like they are replies for no reason at all
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-15 20:51:00 UTC (1697403060966) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-16 03:35:18 UTC (1697427318052) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |