Birdwatch Note
2023-10-15 19:16:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN I see no prove of this being satirical. The reason why people believe this is because it could be true.
Written by 4D3C8D72DDA594DA2AEB09DFB676DBC84D82BE449F871552CF8672F0E6542F0A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1713501284999868916
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1713634876778242248
- noteId - 1713634876778242248
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4D3C8D72DDA594DA2AEB09DFB676DBC84D82BE449F871552CF8672F0E6542F0A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697397367080
- tweetId - 1713501284999868916
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN I see no prove of this being satirical. The reason why people believe this is because it could be true.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-15 19:16:07 UTC (1697397367080) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-16 03:35:18 UTC (1697427318052) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |