Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-15 18:50:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

As part of X-men anniversary, Disney shared a series of fake "what if" comic covers, one of wich shows Mickey Mouse and Daisy Duck as a couple. https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/fact-check-is-disney-breaking-minnie-mickey-mouse-95-years-viral-article-leaves-internet-disheartened

Written by 20843B10353B791D976B3DA079AE3203C079AEC7E4447C4EEAB77CA3530BB515
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1713594079538209244

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1713628484692537720
  • noteId - 1713628484692537720
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 20843B10353B791D976B3DA079AE3203C079AEC7E4447C4EEAB77CA3530BB515 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697395843085
  • tweetId - 1713594079538209244
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • As part of X-men anniversary, Disney shared a series of fake "what if" comic covers, one of wich shows Mickey Mouse and Daisy Duck as a couple. https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/fact-check-is-disney-breaking-minnie-mickey-mouse-95-years-viral-article-leaves-internet-disheartened

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-15 18:50:43 UTC
(1697395843085)
2023-10-16 01:27:53 UTC
(1697419673619)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-16 03:35:18 UTC
(1697427318052)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-16 01:27:53 UTC
(1697419673619)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-15 18:57:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 18:49:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 18:03:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 17:41:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 17:34:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 17:10:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 16:30:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 16:12:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 16:05:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 15:49:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 15:36:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 15:33:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:59:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:39:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:25:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:23:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:17:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:16:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:12:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:11:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:04:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 13:55:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 08:15:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 08:02:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 04:25:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 03:02:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 00:40:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 23:40:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 20:59:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 20:13:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 20:06:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 19:39:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 20:22:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 20:20:27 -0500 Rating Details