Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-15 16:31:04 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

For context, the statement was made in 2019, & not in the wake of the current attack upon Israel. The New York Post included this in the title of the article, but is not stating that it in the post: https://nypost.com/2023/10/15/tlaib-loses-it-in-2019-when-asked-if-israel-has-right-to-exist/

Written by 8B67224415D560E414E3CCEF96AA0389EF6215883EE0C3F8212BF85CB31F1985
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1713576518209708083

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1713593342917747131
  • noteId - 1713593342917747131
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8B67224415D560E414E3CCEF96AA0389EF6215883EE0C3F8212BF85CB31F1985 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697387464636
  • tweetId - 1713576518209708083
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • For context, the statement was made in 2019, & not in the wake of the current attack upon Israel. The New York Post included this in the title of the article, but is not stating that it in the post: https://nypost.com/2023/10/15/tlaib-loses-it-in-2019-when-asked-if-israel-has-right-to-exist/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-15 16:31:04 UTC
(1697387464636)
2023-10-15 20:45:20 UTC
(1697402720409)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-16 03:35:18 UTC
(1697427318052)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-15 20:45:20 UTC
(1697402720409)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-15 14:55:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:30:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:21:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:19:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:15:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:15:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:05:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 14:03:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 13:32:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 13:25:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 13:25:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 13:18:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 13:14:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 13:13:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 13:08:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 12:41:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 12:28:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 12:27:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 12:19:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 11:56:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 11:47:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 11:42:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 20:53:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 20:37:06 -0500 Rating Details