Birdwatch Note
2023-10-13 20:44:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The SCC opinion does not "explicitly affirm the right of the GoC to put in place impact assessment legislation..". The key opinion, expressed by a 5-2 majority, is that the bulk of the legislation is unconstitutional. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/supreme-court-richard-wagner-impact-assessment-act-1.6993720
Written by F8D4E7103820EB18307F19B357A1A5762DE09C4A101AA5305D347F09518287EB
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712877879527084238
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1712932457211990252
- noteId - 1712932457211990252
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F8D4E7103820EB18307F19B357A1A5762DE09C4A101AA5305D347F09518287EB Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697229897202
- tweetId - 1712877879527084238
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The SCC opinion does not "explicitly affirm the right of the GoC to put in place impact assessment legislation..". The key opinion, expressed by a 5-2 majority, is that the bulk of the legislation is unconstitutional. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/supreme-court-richard-wagner-impact-assessment-act-1.6993720
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-13 20:44:57 UTC (1697229897202) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-14 02:31:47 UTC (1697250707273) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-13 20:09:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 20:09:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 19:45:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 19:32:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 19:21:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 18:46:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 18:42:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 17:42:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 17:27:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 17:07:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 16:50:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 16:28:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 15:56:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-14 12:50:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-14 11:59:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-14 08:56:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-14 08:16:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-14 00:10:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 23:39:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 22:28:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 22:21:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 21:30:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 21:26:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-13 21:03:24 -0500 | Rating Details |