Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-13 18:12:04 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Extra context: Here are multiple examples of the same site saying the same image is not ai generated. https://twitter.com/gigachadnumberW/status/1712627518413459467?t=R7QPlpvReheCt30H4QrACg&s=19 https://twitter.com/SoCalRuss1982/status/1712578776151085107?t=nmQYZAQ3GjyRwHz7BNmzVA&s=19 https://twitter.com/katyusharocket1/s tatus/1712602422185689314?t=nmQYZAQ3GjyRwHz7BNmzVA&s=19 The New York Times reports that AI image detectors are not always accurate: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/28/technology/ai-detection-midjourney-stable-diffusion-dalle.html

Written by BD5764B51454559F1708E87B51055C825ECCE8303EDC6C103A7DE6306D8D43A7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712576081562394846

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712893984010314219
  • noteId - 1712893984010314219
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BD5764B51454559F1708E87B51055C825ECCE8303EDC6C103A7DE6306D8D43A7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697220724477
  • tweetId - 1712576081562394846
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Extra context: Here are multiple examples of the same site saying the same image is not ai generated. https://twitter.com/gigachadnumberW/status/1712627518413459467?t=R7QPlpvReheCt30H4QrACg&s=19 https://twitter.com/SoCalRuss1982/status/1712578776151085107?t=nmQYZAQ3GjyRwHz7BNmzVA&s=19 https://twitter.com/katyusharocket1/s tatus/1712602422185689314?t=nmQYZAQ3GjyRwHz7BNmzVA&s=19 The New York Times reports that AI image detectors are not always accurate: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/28/technology/ai-detection-midjourney-stable-diffusion-dalle.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-13 18:12:04 UTC
(1697220724477)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-14 02:31:47 UTC
(1697250707273)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-13 16:49:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 17:23:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 10:45:11 -0500 Rating Details