Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-13 17:12:17 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

AI detectors can be inaccurate and their results should therefore not be interpreted as definitive proof: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/28/technology/ai-detection-midjourney-stable-diffusion-dalle.html 4chan on which it seems the dog photo was uploaded is not a reliable source

Written by C96DA607EB68B656046B6125CEB891987FA0204084DA5F0E575FDA5E986671EA
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712666595745505698

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712878938723119494
  • noteId - 1712878938723119494
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C96DA607EB68B656046B6125CEB891987FA0204084DA5F0E575FDA5E986671EA Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697217137401
  • tweetId - 1712666595745505698
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • AI detectors can be inaccurate and their results should therefore not be interpreted as definitive proof: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/28/technology/ai-detection-midjourney-stable-diffusion-dalle.html 4chan on which it seems the dog photo was uploaded is not a reliable source

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-13 17:12:17 UTC
(1697217137401)
2023-10-13 20:41:37 UTC
(1697229697361)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-14 02:31:47 UTC
(1697250707273)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-13 20:41:37 UTC
(1697229697361)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-13 14:25:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 14:25:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 14:19:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 14:16:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 14:07:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:58:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:54:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:46:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:45:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:43:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:40:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:38:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:30:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:22:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:20:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:18:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 12:29:26 -0500 Rating Details