Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-13 05:11:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Extra context. This post had a community note stating that the image was ai generated. The same image was tested on the same site by multiple people & it said it wasn't ai generated. https://twitter.com/SoCalRuss1982/status/1712578776151085107?t=nmQYZAQ3GjyRwHz7BNmzVA&s=19 https://twitter.com/katyusharocket1/status/1712602422185689314?t=nmQYZAQ3GjyRwHz7BNmzVA&s=19 https://twitter.com/gigachadnumberW/status/1712627518413459467?t=R7QPlpvReheCt30H4QrACg&s=19 The New York Times also reported that AI image detectors are not always accurate: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/28/technology/ai-detection-midjourney-stable-diffusion-dalle.html

Written by 39D87CDDC6E624FC19D3AAA3780E035E4C4ABDE16526AE3102BE3B577CFBFC63
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712479655956279712

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712697594101596385
  • noteId - 1712697594101596385
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 39D87CDDC6E624FC19D3AAA3780E035E4C4ABDE16526AE3102BE3B577CFBFC63 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697173901473
  • tweetId - 1712479655956279712
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Extra context. This post had a community note stating that the image was ai generated. The same image was tested on the same site by multiple people & it said it wasn't ai generated. https://twitter.com/SoCalRuss1982/status/1712578776151085107?t=nmQYZAQ3GjyRwHz7BNmzVA&s=19 https://twitter.com/katyusharocket1/status/1712602422185689314?t=nmQYZAQ3GjyRwHz7BNmzVA&s=19 https://twitter.com/gigachadnumberW/status/1712627518413459467?t=R7QPlpvReheCt30H4QrACg&s=19 The New York Times also reported that AI image detectors are not always accurate: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/28/technology/ai-detection-midjourney-stable-diffusion-dalle.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-13 05:11:41 UTC
(1697173901473)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-14 02:31:47 UTC
(1697250707273)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-13 15:35:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 14:47:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 14:25:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:22:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:18:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 12:25:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 11:30:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 08:13:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 08:02:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 07:51:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 06:26:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 06:17:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 06:12:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 06:03:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 06:00:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 04:10:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 03:12:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 02:18:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 01:47:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 01:10:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 00:45:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 00:27:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 00:20:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 00:18:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 08:48:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 01:38:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-15 05:03:37 -0500 Rating Details