Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-13 01:50:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Schneider v. Rusk, the case Cenk cites, requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law. However, the majority made one exception: "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the 'natural born' citizen is eligible to be President" Source: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/163/

Written by E76BB444E889E43CD9A3C2EF1BFC9A2DBE9ACC463730C22339976825A5EFEDCF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712638072113029415

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712647029237981408
  • noteId - 1712647029237981408
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E76BB444E889E43CD9A3C2EF1BFC9A2DBE9ACC463730C22339976825A5EFEDCF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697161845868
  • tweetId - 1712638072113029415
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Schneider v. Rusk, the case Cenk cites, requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law. However, the majority made one exception: "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the 'natural born' citizen is eligible to be President" Source: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/163/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-13 01:50:45 UTC
(1697161845868)
2023-10-13 10:00:15 UTC
(1697191215770)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-14 02:31:47 UTC
(1697250707273)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-13 10:00:15 UTC
(1697191215770)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-13 16:46:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 16:30:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 13:30:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 11:56:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 11:35:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 11:27:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 10:22:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 09:59:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 09:48:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 08:43:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 03:35:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 01:34:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 23:53:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 23:24:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 22:29:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 22:22:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 22:14:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 21:45:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 21:44:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 21:39:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 21:09:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 21:01:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 20:59:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 20:53:08 -0500 Rating Details