Birdwatch Note
2023-10-13 00:21:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN basically an opinion and the difference is so minimal.
Written by F16E31AB82A7FFC5F84CF82649D1D766DF87DC1715A106F74D670E89279E6E7C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712447545572516175
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1712624559537393865
- noteId - 1712624559537393865
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F16E31AB82A7FFC5F84CF82649D1D766DF87DC1715A106F74D670E89279E6E7C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697156488676
- tweetId - 1712447545572516175
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN basically an opinion and the difference is so minimal.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-13 00:21:28 UTC (1697156488676) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-13 06:00:37 UTC (1697176837336) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-13 02:36:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-13 01:22:53 -0500 | Rating Details |