Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-12 10:36:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This post uses a logical fallacy: "1.25% success rate" cherry-picks $1B exits/successes. Many YC funded companies which don't fall in that 1.25% are by all definitions of the word "successful" (i.e. creating value, profitable) meaning failure rate of joining YC is not 98.75%

Written by FF94016A6433F744D820005D042486BFE10F37B47066FB7D326E18265E39049F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712356821523161587

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712417027678216325
  • noteId - 1712417027678216325
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FF94016A6433F744D820005D042486BFE10F37B47066FB7D326E18265E39049F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697107009226
  • tweetId - 1712356821523161587
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • This post uses a logical fallacy: "1.25% success rate" cherry-picks $1B exits/successes. Many YC funded companies which don't fall in that 1.25% are by all definitions of the word "successful" (i.e. creating value, profitable) meaning failure rate of joining YC is not 98.75%

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-12 10:36:49 UTC
(1697107009226)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-13 06:00:37 UTC
(1697176837336)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-12 16:48:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 16:16:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 14:33:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 13:45:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 13:32:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 12:24:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 11:14:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 11:09:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 10:34:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 09:42:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 09:17:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 09:14:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 08:18:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 07:42:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 07:10:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 20:21:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 01:39:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 00:50:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 00:14:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 20:56:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 20:52:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 19:57:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 00:41:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 23:17:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-17 18:44:26 -0600 Rating Details