Birdwatch Note
2023-10-12 08:15:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Yes supporters have repeatedly failed to explain how a Voice to Parliament will actually solve existing problems. If anything, a Voice to Parliament would divide Australians racially, add to more bureaucracy, and increase costs to taxpayers. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/australia-is-not-racist-but-the-voice-could-make-it-so/news-story/f167a132182401ba391bece1b096fa27 https://citynews.com.au/2023/this-race-based-constitution-change-divides-us/ https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/04/inevitably-the-voice-will-become-hated/ https://ruleoflawaustralia.com.au/commentary/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-is-an-affront-to-democracy/ https://www.taxpayers.org.au/voice
Written by 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712007965170188549
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1712381578142527781
- noteId - 1712381578142527781
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697098557398
- tweetId - 1712007965170188549
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Yes supporters have repeatedly failed to explain how a Voice to Parliament will actually solve existing problems. If anything, a Voice to Parliament would divide Australians racially, add to more bureaucracy, and increase costs to taxpayers. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/australia-is-not-racist-but-the-voice-could-make-it-so/news-story/f167a132182401ba391bece1b096fa27 https://citynews.com.au/2023/this-race-based-constitution-change-divides-us/ https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/04/inevitably-the-voice-will-become-hated/ https://ruleoflawaustralia.com.au/commentary/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-is-an-affront-to-democracy/ https://www.taxpayers.org.au/voice
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-12 08:15:57 UTC (1697098557398) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-13 06:00:37 UTC (1697176837336) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-12 07:02:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-12 04:12:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-19 11:28:58 -0500 | Rating Details |