Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-12 03:11:39 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

NN. The OP is presenting pseudoscience as legitimate scholarship. This is incredibly misleading. The second study in the OP is published in a widely disreputable journal. This is very important context, regardless of whether it doesn't fit with your ideological preconceptions

Written by 85F99FC99E0EA43C9FE59E3650E5EA1B5E3A3F915F6578316E0BAA94CB7F9E90
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1712304998452011078
• noteId - 1712304998452011078
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 85F99FC99E0EA43C9FE59E3650E5EA1B5E3A3F915F6578316E0BAA94CB7F9E90 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1697080299375
• tweetId - 1711574037543940381
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• NN. The OP is presenting pseudoscience as legitimate scholarship. This is incredibly misleading. The second study in the OP is published in a widely disreputable journal. This is very important context, regardless of whether it doesn't fit with your ideological preconceptions