Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-11 17:31:17 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The study only shows that greener areas attract higher number of birds, and since more affluent neighborhoods tend to have larger green spaces, the diversity of birds is positively affected by those enriched landscapes. https://academic.oup.com/condor/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ornithapp/duad044

Written by B37221E24BED58E1F953F3FAE855ADEFAD7912B64927E2F16B212A1EBB543335
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712123300896510363

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712158945014390912
  • noteId - 1712158945014390912
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B37221E24BED58E1F953F3FAE855ADEFAD7912B64927E2F16B212A1EBB543335 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697045477522
  • tweetId - 1712123300896510363
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The study only shows that greener areas attract higher number of birds, and since more affluent neighborhoods tend to have larger green spaces, the diversity of birds is positively affected by those enriched landscapes. https://academic.oup.com/condor/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ornithapp/duad044

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-11 17:31:17 UTC
(1697045477522)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-12 04:03:32 UTC
(1697083412198)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-11 18:02:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 17:25:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 16:49:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 16:40:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 16:07:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 15:18:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 14:07:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 13:39:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 13:37:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 13:34:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 13:03:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 13:01:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 13:00:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 12:52:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 12:46:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 12:42:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 10:52:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 07:32:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 06:30:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 06:17:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 04:37:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 16:39:51 -0500 Rating Details