Birdwatch Note
2023-10-11 16:17:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The tweet expresses an opinion and is making an argument on a controversial subject. Counter-arguments belong in replies, not notes.
Written by 2A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711355807441305774
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1712140499354628299
- noteId - 1712140499354628299
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697041079736
- tweetId - 1711355807441305774
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The tweet expresses an opinion and is making an argument on a controversial subject. Counter-arguments belong in replies, not notes.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-11 16:17:59 UTC (1697041079736) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-12 04:03:32 UTC (1697083412198) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |