Birdwatch Note
2023-10-11 15:38:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN: title it says allegedly and in the article itself it gets debunked
Written by C96A1CE3D71A720B3E7CB5F43EF9B8B7CEF51EFA12570A38B7683682EDCD2442
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712120887670145240
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1712130548943008005
- noteId - 1712130548943008005
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C96A1CE3D71A720B3E7CB5F43EF9B8B7CEF51EFA12570A38B7683682EDCD2442 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697038707374
- tweetId - 1712120887670145240
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN: title it says allegedly and in the article itself it gets debunked
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-11 15:38:27 UTC (1697038707374) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-12 04:03:32 UTC (1697083412198) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-11 12:09:21 -0500 | Rating Details |