Birdwatch Note
2023-10-11 12:37:57 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Her post expresses an opinion and she does not say the gentleman in the photo has been captured/ arrested, so this doesn't need to be rebutted. NNN.
Written by C56CE012FC36F6F03000B45B5588BE3C750D3A944F1FAB1D6C54D69B893FF1B4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712005760195166280
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1712085125045825848
- noteId - 1712085125045825848
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C56CE012FC36F6F03000B45B5588BE3C750D3A944F1FAB1D6C54D69B893FF1B4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697027877470
- tweetId - 1712005760195166280
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Her post expresses an opinion and she does not say the gentleman in the photo has been captured/ arrested, so this doesn't need to be rebutted. NNN.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-11 12:37:57 UTC (1697027877470) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-12 04:03:32 UTC (1697083412198) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |