Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-11 06:43:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Die Untersuchungshaft bezog sich auf 1. versuchter Betrug 2. Geldwäsche 3. Steuerdelikte 1. und 2. wurden vom Landgericht Stuttgart zur Verhandlung vorerst nicht zugelassen, 3. hingegen durchaus: https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/baden-wuerttemberg/stuttgart/landgericht-stuttgart-lehnt-eroeffnung-von-hauptverfahren-gegen-ballweg-ab-100.html https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/badenwuerttemberg/swr-landgericht-stuttgart-prozess-gegen-ballweg-nur-wegen-steuerdelikten-100.html

Written by 987DEEC6F11A9A015D101D6FC8220037314072C1F5E91A68593BA19184A7DEF5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711829147482198341

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1711995881400967555
  • noteId - 1711995881400967555
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 987DEEC6F11A9A015D101D6FC8220037314072C1F5E91A68593BA19184A7DEF5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697006600130
  • tweetId - 1711829147482198341
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Die Untersuchungshaft bezog sich auf 1. versuchter Betrug 2. Geldwäsche 3. Steuerdelikte 1. und 2. wurden vom Landgericht Stuttgart zur Verhandlung vorerst nicht zugelassen, 3. hingegen durchaus: https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/baden-wuerttemberg/stuttgart/landgericht-stuttgart-lehnt-eroeffnung-von-hauptverfahren-gegen-ballweg-ab-100.html https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/badenwuerttemberg/swr-landgericht-stuttgart-prozess-gegen-ballweg-nur-wegen-steuerdelikten-100.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-11 06:43:20 UTC
(1697006600130)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-12 04:03:32 UTC
(1697083412198)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-11 16:45:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 15:39:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 13:56:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 12:30:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 10:21:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 07:01:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 06:36:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 05:16:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 04:52:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 04:30:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 04:24:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 04:24:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 04:02:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 03:22:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 03:05:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:49:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:43:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:39:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:33:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:32:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:32:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:26:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:10:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:01:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 01:50:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 06:16:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 00:19:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 23:22:15 -0500 Rating Details