Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-10 23:43:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

A cidade de Belo Horizonte não usou as urnas eletrônicas do TSE. https://www.tre-mg.jus.br/comunicacao/noticias/2023/Outubro/bh-capital-mineira-nao-utilizou-urnas-eletronicas-nas-eleicoes-dos-conselhos-tutelares-que-foram-canceladas https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/portugues/ZX5IWEH5ZZINZIPIOAE63XD7P4-2023-10-10/

Written by 060F55BBD029A3D039C7E48A419953CB785F03C1D6D76097F13B72CEB45C523C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711807877101256841

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1711890180368417100
  • noteId - 1711890180368417100
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 060F55BBD029A3D039C7E48A419953CB785F03C1D6D76097F13B72CEB45C523C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696981399039
  • tweetId - 1711807877101256841
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • A cidade de Belo Horizonte não usou as urnas eletrônicas do TSE. https://www.tre-mg.jus.br/comunicacao/noticias/2023/Outubro/bh-capital-mineira-nao-utilizou-urnas-eletronicas-nas-eleicoes-dos-conselhos-tutelares-que-foram-canceladas https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/portugues/ZX5IWEH5ZZINZIPIOAE63XD7P4-2023-10-10/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-10 23:43:19 UTC
(1696981399039)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-11 04:14:31 UTC
(1696997671017)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-10 18:51:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 18:45:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 09:17:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 08:57:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 08:35:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 08:20:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 07:32:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 06:02:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 03:05:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:56:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 22:11:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 21:08:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 20:03:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 18:38:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 18:29:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 18:25:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 19:54:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 02:48:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 22:26:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 18:45:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 18:42:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 18:37:40 -0500 Rating Details