Birdwatch Note
2023-10-10 16:33:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This post has no basis in fact, is pure speculation and is sexist in nature.
Written by EC7B2F8C6E6F5206688D159DBDB66DB17D533F8A5D2563CD08B4A475CE17DA1F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711513118147293564
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1711782006659437026
- noteId - 1711782006659437026
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - EC7B2F8C6E6F5206688D159DBDB66DB17D533F8A5D2563CD08B4A475CE17DA1F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696955608419
- tweetId - 1711513118147293564
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- This post has no basis in fact, is pure speculation and is sexist in nature.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-10 16:33:28 UTC (1696955608419) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-11 04:14:31 UTC (1696997671017) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-10 13:13:36 -0500 | Rating Details |