Birdwatch Note
2023-10-10 14:58:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Technically, the Conservatives did "introduce" the National *Living* Wage. Labour did, however, create the National *Minimum* Wage, as the top CN states. Due to the wording of the original post, by technicality, it is factually correct. https://www.crunch.co.uk/knowledge-running-a-business/living-wage-minimum-wage-whats-difference
Written by F387A847B3DAEFF590AC23CC10E629EEE82B6F1DEAA6EE8A04DC0DDDA7DE0CA8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711741378265268459
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1711758225068921185
- noteId - 1711758225068921185
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F387A847B3DAEFF590AC23CC10E629EEE82B6F1DEAA6EE8A04DC0DDDA7DE0CA8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696949938443
- tweetId - 1711741378265268459
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Technically, the Conservatives did "introduce" the National *Living* Wage. Labour did, however, create the National *Minimum* Wage, as the top CN states. Due to the wording of the original post, by technicality, it is factually correct. https://www.crunch.co.uk/knowledge-running-a-business/living-wage-minimum-wage-whats-difference
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-10 14:58:58 UTC (1696949938443) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-11 04:14:31 UTC (1696997671017) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-10 18:58:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 17:11:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 16:54:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 16:38:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 16:32:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 15:51:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 15:49:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 15:20:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 15:17:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 14:56:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 13:59:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 13:53:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 13:37:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 12:34:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 11:13:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 10:50:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 10:47:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 10:12:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 10:09:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-11 06:24:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-11 05:07:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-11 01:33:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-11 00:42:00 -0500 | Rating Details |