Birdwatch Note
2023-10-09 23:16:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
A pesar de que la planta Lo de Coy cuenta con cámaras de seguridad no se ha compartido evidencia del supuesto ingreso de personas armadas.
Written by 619ABCCA53F0AE4A8E322AC2FCD01F717EC4020034A9FF5D19A3583ED47EE1F2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711472761216938182
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1711520945095999625
- noteId - 1711520945095999625
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 619ABCCA53F0AE4A8E322AC2FCD01F717EC4020034A9FF5D19A3583ED47EE1F2 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696893366489
- tweetId - 1711472761216938182
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- A pesar de que la planta Lo de Coy cuenta con cámaras de seguridad no se ha compartido evidencia del supuesto ingreso de personas armadas.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-09 23:16:06 UTC (1696893366489) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-11 04:14:31 UTC (1696997671017) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-09 19:27:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 19:20:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 18:37:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 18:22:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 18:44:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 15:29:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 11:14:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 07:48:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 06:59:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-10 00:47:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 22:07:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 21:39:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 20:33:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 20:03:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 19:39:11 -0500 | Rating Details |