Birdwatch Note
2023-10-09 16:49:25 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
It was a tongue in cheek comment by “some” Brighton fans but Sky is milking it for interactions. Embarrassing. Many articles have been written on Brighton fans teasing with such comments. Sky using it for interactions. https://metro.co.uk/2023/10/08/brighton-fans-chant-we-want-a-replay-during-liverpool-draw-19627596/amp/
Written by FF9A0ADCC12F4EA1A9D4C71848C2ACF2DFEB251F9FF6BA5EFA41696D71585A6E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711418997261156810
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1711423633040593324
- noteId - 1711423633040593324
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FF9A0ADCC12F4EA1A9D4C71848C2ACF2DFEB251F9FF6BA5EFA41696D71585A6E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696870165486
- tweetId - 1711418997261156810
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- It was a tongue in cheek comment by “some” Brighton fans but Sky is milking it for interactions. Embarrassing. Many articles have been written on Brighton fans teasing with such comments. Sky using it for interactions. https://metro.co.uk/2023/10/08/brighton-fans-chant-we-want-a-replay-during-liverpool-draw-19627596/amp/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-09 16:49:25 UTC (1696870165486) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-10 02:37:28 UTC (1696905448835) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-09 17:28:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 17:00:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 16:22:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 15:54:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 15:14:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 13:53:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 12:14:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-10 11:49:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-10 03:59:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-10 02:42:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 22:32:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 22:19:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 22:11:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 21:55:24 -0500 | Rating Details |