Birdwatch Note
2023-10-09 14:51:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The proposed regulation does not respect human right to right and freedom of privacy and expression as granted by: - CoE’s ECHR (Art. 8) https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Guide_Art_8_ENG - UN’s UDHC (Art. 12, 18, 19) https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights - EU’s CFR (Art. 7): https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/7-respect-private-and-family-life It is also in the middle of a political scandal and unproven to work: https://www.euractiv.com/section/law-enforcement/news/ngos-commission-and-money-what-is-going-on-with-child-sexual-abuse-regulation/ https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content/ https://edri.org/our-work/most-criticised-eu-law-of-all-time/
Written by 998759CB03ECFB0598161070F25D98C195C57BF87234916D769D2C29BD2CAF43
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1710243629933981819
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1711394070646362243
- noteId - 1711394070646362243
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 998759CB03ECFB0598161070F25D98C195C57BF87234916D769D2C29BD2CAF43 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696863117266
- tweetId - 1710243629933981819
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The proposed regulation does not respect human right to right and freedom of privacy and expression as granted by: - CoE’s ECHR (Art. 8) https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Guide_Art_8_ENG - UN’s UDHC (Art. 12, 18, 19) https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights - EU’s CFR (Art. 7): https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/7-respect-private-and-family-life It is also in the middle of a political scandal and unproven to work: https://www.euractiv.com/section/law-enforcement/news/ngos-commission-and-money-what-is-going-on-with-child-sexual-abuse-regulation/ https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content/ https://edri.org/our-work/most-criticised-eu-law-of-all-time/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-09 14:51:57 UTC (1696863117266) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-10 02:37:28 UTC (1696905448835) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |