Birdwatch Note
2023-10-09 12:57:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This tweet implies that women's toilets are not dirty, however that is untrue. Generally speaking, all toilets are dirty, and a study found women's toilets were more contaminated and had a greater number of bacteria than men's. https://ciriscience.org/ieq-measurement/enteric-bacterial-contamination-of-public-restrooms/
Written by 4BEED981E2A6891E2659AEEDA8995FF8791EFE6417C8F7EFFFB6F1492F97D447
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711034387221844256
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1711365155659940307
- noteId - 1711365155659940307
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4BEED981E2A6891E2659AEEDA8995FF8791EFE6417C8F7EFFFB6F1492F97D447 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696856223395
- tweetId - 1711034387221844256
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This tweet implies that women's toilets are not dirty, however that is untrue. Generally speaking, all toilets are dirty, and a study found women's toilets were more contaminated and had a greater number of bacteria than men's. https://ciriscience.org/ieq-measurement/enteric-bacterial-contamination-of-public-restrooms/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-09 12:57:03 UTC (1696856223395) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-10 02:37:28 UTC (1696905448835) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-09 11:46:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 11:34:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 10:35:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 09:59:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 09:53:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 09:48:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 09:25:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 09:24:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 08:54:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 08:34:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 07:59:16 -0500 | Rating Details |