Birdwatch Note
2023-10-08 18:18:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, unless it’s fully confirmed as real then they shouldn’t be a community note. “Likely” isn’t enough to justify community note. Furthermore Skwawkbox is not a neutral site and is known to have an anti-Starmer stance, therefore it shouldn’t be considered a reliable source.
Written by CF3927D6A4AEF0CE423C7C6F6B1A789501814518A8A84B480D352E2B9D5902B3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1710979175589290434
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1711083684357357989
- noteId - 1711083684357357989
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - CF3927D6A4AEF0CE423C7C6F6B1A789501814518A8A84B480D352E2B9D5902B3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696789115404
- tweetId - 1710979175589290434
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN, unless it’s fully confirmed as real then they shouldn’t be a community note. “Likely” isn’t enough to justify community note. Furthermore Skwawkbox is not a neutral site and is known to have an anti-Starmer stance, therefore it shouldn’t be considered a reliable source.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-08 18:18:35 UTC (1696789115404) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-09 02:31:38 UTC (1696818698849) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-08 19:10:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 17:53:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 17:43:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 17:13:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 17:11:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 17:01:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 16:34:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 16:06:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 15:05:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 14:39:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 14:36:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 14:25:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 14:16:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 14:16:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 14:16:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 13:56:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 13:33:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 13:21:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 09:09:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 06:21:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 06:15:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 05:21:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 04:26:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 04:16:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 04:02:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 03:20:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 03:09:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 02:36:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 02:31:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 02:10:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 01:50:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 01:48:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 21:57:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 21:17:00 -0500 | Rating Details |