Birdwatch Note
2023-10-08 12:38:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The article that the headline is drawn from (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/10/07/labour-party-plans-fiscal-rules/) itself contains a rebuttal of the central claim about government fiscal rules under Labour. “We can categorically rule out incorporating additional public assets into the debt rule."
Written by F7482E2D9F326AE51E16299D606748629469F0CE06CB572937201FBA6D35CC34
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1710969666850468221
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1710998195218559109
- noteId - 1710998195218559109
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F7482E2D9F326AE51E16299D606748629469F0CE06CB572937201FBA6D35CC34 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696768733206
- tweetId - 1710969666850468221
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The article that the headline is drawn from (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/10/07/labour-party-plans-fiscal-rules/) itself contains a rebuttal of the central claim about government fiscal rules under Labour. “We can categorically rule out incorporating additional public assets into the debt rule."
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-08 12:38:53 UTC (1696768733206) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-09 02:31:38 UTC (1696818698849) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-08 18:41:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 18:24:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 17:10:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 17:07:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 16:32:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 15:43:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 15:22:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 14:58:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 13:42:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 13:14:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 12:57:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 12:03:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 11:57:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 11:33:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 10:52:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 10:46:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 09:32:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-08 08:26:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 13:38:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 12:31:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 08:40:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 08:29:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 08:20:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 07:25:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 06:19:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 05:07:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 04:51:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 04:03:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 04:00:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 03:42:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-09 01:37:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-10 13:50:45 -0500 | Rating Details |