Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-08 07:55:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Seeing it for the first time, I wasn't sure if it was real and written as instruction from staff, a test, or just a joke. If a valid post, I would have attached a link to verify the information posted to know this was a fact and coming from Twitter. It was also slow to read.

Written by 52020051E1A4235E1FC57EE34D50D31BBEC8D0FB873B52A741A1D4975950FC21
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1709324581549261111

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1710926906617418203
  • noteId - 1710926906617418203
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 52020051E1A4235E1FC57EE34D50D31BBEC8D0FB873B52A741A1D4975950FC21 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696751736678
  • tweetId - 1709324581549261111
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Seeing it for the first time, I wasn't sure if it was real and written as instruction from staff, a test, or just a joke. If a valid post, I would have attached a link to verify the information posted to know this was a fact and coming from Twitter. It was also slow to read.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-08 07:55:36 UTC
(1696751736678)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-09 02:31:38 UTC
(1696818698849)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-08 05:29:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 04:24:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-09 19:27:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 15:03:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 11:18:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 10:23:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 09:12:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 01:08:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-09 21:08:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 21:23:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 12:13:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 11:52:47 -0500 Rating Details