Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-08 04:52:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

"A journalist with English-language WIONews in India reports that a Taliban spokesperson has denied reports it had sought approval to travel through Iran and Iraq." https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattnovak/2023/10/07/7-viral-tweets-about-the-israel-gaza-conflict-that-are-actually-fake/?sh=5d333e163dc1

Written by B54E3D10838C51ABF6CB17567EC2167853D2EA7672709E1AA079AC59A79F1301
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1710682052427739648

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1710880859526709553
  • noteId - 1710880859526709553
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B54E3D10838C51ABF6CB17567EC2167853D2EA7672709E1AA079AC59A79F1301 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696740758197
  • tweetId - 1710682052427739648
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • "A journalist with English-language WIONews in India reports that a Taliban spokesperson has denied reports it had sought approval to travel through Iran and Iraq." https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattnovak/2023/10/07/7-viral-tweets-about-the-israel-gaza-conflict-that-are-actually-fake/?sh=5d333e163dc1

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-08 04:52:38 UTC
(1696740758197)
2023-10-08 09:03:31 UTC
(1696755811712)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-09 02:31:38 UTC
(1696818698849)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-08 09:03:31 UTC
(1696755811712)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-08 10:28:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 08:49:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 08:29:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 05:35:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 05:34:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 05:08:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 04:09:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 03:45:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 03:25:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 03:00:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 02:48:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 02:29:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 02:25:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 02:20:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 01:11:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 01:09:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 01:07:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 00:46:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 00:45:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 00:14:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 00:00:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 11:01:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 14:47:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-08 07:18:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-08 23:01:10 -0500 Rating Details