Birdwatch Note
2023-10-07 22:46:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN: “ according to experts and fact-checkers.”?? Seriously? 😂
Written by FC9E0A8DBF9173C60DC171330FFA45B2562254A3AFAED4632D057682C47CEB70
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1710243098297880732
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1710788788471873655
- noteId - 1710788788471873655
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FC9E0A8DBF9173C60DC171330FFA45B2562254A3AFAED4632D057682C47CEB70 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696718806747
- tweetId - 1710243098297880732
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN: “ according to experts and fact-checkers.”?? Seriously? 😂
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-07 22:46:46 UTC (1696718806747) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-08 02:05:31 UTC (1696730731750) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |