Birdwatch Note
2023-10-06 01:15:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN In 2015 The Guardian wrote an article titled, "Welcome to Ukraine, the most corrupt nation in Europe" With such a poor reputation it is perfectly reasonable to allege corruption in a post. Counterarguments should be in the replies, not CN. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/feb/04/welcome-to-the-most-corrupt-nation-in-europe-ukraine
Written by 09900C109940B3215F43F7948050525E31100A7975D01A9E63CC7696F8FC53DD
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1710042491343225098
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1710101374560592151
- noteId - 1710101374560592151
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 09900C109940B3215F43F7948050525E31100A7975D01A9E63CC7696F8FC53DD Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696554914501
- tweetId - 1710042491343225098
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN In 2015 The Guardian wrote an article titled, "Welcome to Ukraine, the most corrupt nation in Europe" With such a poor reputation it is perfectly reasonable to allege corruption in a post. Counterarguments should be in the replies, not CN. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/feb/04/welcome-to-the-most-corrupt-nation-in-europe-ukraine
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-06 01:15:14 UTC (1696554914501) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-07 02:42:31 UTC (1696646551297) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-06 16:28:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-06 10:33:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-06 07:43:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 23:12:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 22:59:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 21:46:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 21:35:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 21:27:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 21:21:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 20:39:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 20:37:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 20:30:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 20:30:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 20:30:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-06 21:23:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-11 16:43:52 -0500 | Rating Details |