Birdwatch Note
2023-10-05 16:13:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This post is potentially misleading. ‘Longest lasting’ is subjective & misleading The iPhone 5S still maintains the longest security patch record. (Sep 20th 2013 - Jan 2023) ‘fastest’ is misleading; Apple’s A17 chip currently holds the best performance rating. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_version_history https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-list/rating
Written by F00CA1D0FB8F2038CD4640E83B9FA8B5B8F5329E97E2B2D5B178291483DF047C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1709722497048887378
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1709965076319654003
- noteId - 1709965076319654003
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F00CA1D0FB8F2038CD4640E83B9FA8B5B8F5329E97E2B2D5B178291483DF047C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696522418466
- tweetId - 1709722497048887378
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This post is potentially misleading. ‘Longest lasting’ is subjective & misleading The iPhone 5S still maintains the longest security patch record. (Sep 20th 2013 - Jan 2023) ‘fastest’ is misleading; Apple’s A17 chip currently holds the best performance rating. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_version_history https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-list/rating
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-05 16:13:38 UTC (1696522418466) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-06 02:07:38 UTC (1696558058453) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-05 17:13:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 16:29:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 16:29:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 15:39:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 14:37:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-06 07:32:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 23:26:18 -0500 | Rating Details |