Birdwatch Note
2023-10-05 14:39:30 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Neither this study nor any other has demonstrated predictive utility from electromagnetic effects, despite a wealth of freely-available geomagnetic data. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/are-earthquakes-associated-variations-geomagnetic-field There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction. https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities Fact-checks of user's earthquake pseudoscience claims: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-earthquake-prediction-262451352553 https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/01/man-s-huge-quake-prediction-is-fearmongering-geonet.html https://www.snopes.com/news/2017/03/01/dutch-earthquake-enthusiast-claims-to-predict-major-tremor/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/05/28/massive-california-earthquake-predicted-for-today/
Written by 8BBA91C4957E89E3F3E7375E11B946CC2326AC39FC2BFFD5359824DDE642711C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1709807177924276560
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1709941388048236683
- noteId - 1709941388048236683
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8BBA91C4957E89E3F3E7375E11B946CC2326AC39FC2BFFD5359824DDE642711C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696516770742
- tweetId - 1709807177924276560
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Neither this study nor any other has demonstrated predictive utility from electromagnetic effects, despite a wealth of freely-available geomagnetic data. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/are-earthquakes-associated-variations-geomagnetic-field There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction. https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities Fact-checks of user's earthquake pseudoscience claims: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-earthquake-prediction-262451352553 https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/01/man-s-huge-quake-prediction-is-fearmongering-geonet.html https://www.snopes.com/news/2017/03/01/dutch-earthquake-enthusiast-claims-to-predict-major-tremor/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/05/28/massive-california-earthquake-predicted-for-today/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-05 14:39:30 UTC (1696516770742) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-06 02:07:38 UTC (1696558058453) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-05 13:15:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-05 12:37:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-05 12:27:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-05 12:13:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-05 12:13:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-05 10:28:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-05 10:13:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-05 10:01:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-05 21:52:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-07 12:43:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-07 02:07:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-05-22 22:27:18 -0500 | Rating Details |