Birdwatch Note
2023-10-05 12:59:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
According to the definition offered in court by the Scottish Gov lawyer on 4th Oct, Amber is a man under the Equality Act &, as such, not eligible to stand on a women only short list. The SNP is breaking the law as stated in court by a KC representing their Gov. https://x.com/tribunaltweets2/status/1709561924684235069?s=20
Written by 8E1823F743286A3321487423FED638383250477782C23DD00E9B3324F4473CEA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1709872883059544278
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1709916337655431187
- noteId - 1709916337655431187
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E1823F743286A3321487423FED638383250477782C23DD00E9B3324F4473CEA Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696510798264
- tweetId - 1709872883059544278
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- According to the definition offered in court by the Scottish Gov lawyer on 4th Oct, Amber is a man under the Equality Act &, as such, not eligible to stand on a women only short list. The SNP is breaking the law as stated in court by a KC representing their Gov. https://x.com/tribunaltweets2/status/1709561924684235069?s=20
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-05 12:59:58 UTC (1696510798264) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-06 02:07:38 UTC (1696558058453) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-05 16:03:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 13:53:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 12:29:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 11:39:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 10:40:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 08:57:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 08:35:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-06 09:03:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-06 06:27:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 21:15:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-18 15:35:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-18 15:34:02 -0500 | Rating Details |