Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-04 22:02:13 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

A jornalista ao fazer tal afirmação, utiliza de uma interpretação incompatível com o nosso modelo de governo. Se fossemos utilizar de tal afirmação, então o ex-presidente Jair Bolsonaro deveria governar as regiões onde obteve a vitória nas urnas como por exemplo sul e sudeste.

Written by FC92A76C38CF0BC35DF9E4801108CCC03FE251C4637ECFE36040E29D5C0730F8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1709554409980498317

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1709690413966073897
  • noteId - 1709690413966073897
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FC92A76C38CF0BC35DF9E4801108CCC03FE251C4637ECFE36040E29D5C0730F8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696456933862
  • tweetId - 1709554409980498317
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • A jornalista ao fazer tal afirmação, utiliza de uma interpretação incompatível com o nosso modelo de governo. Se fossemos utilizar de tal afirmação, então o ex-presidente Jair Bolsonaro deveria governar as regiões onde obteve a vitória nas urnas como por exemplo sul e sudeste.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-04 22:02:13 UTC
(1696456933862)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-10-05 02:47:39 UTC
(1696474059718)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-04 19:07:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 18:34:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 17:54:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 17:51:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 17:40:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 17:27:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 17:15:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 17:14:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 17:12:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 17:02:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 14:25:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 14:11:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 11:28:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 11:20:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 10:07:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 09:24:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 07:34:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 07:14:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 05:56:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 03:08:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 03:02:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 01:03:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 00:07:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 23:11:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 22:00:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 21:57:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 21:40:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 21:31:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 21:23:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 21:03:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 20:47:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 20:04:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 19:56:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 06:26:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-09 23:14:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 12:15:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-01-19 10:55:41 -0600 Rating Details