Birdwatch Note
2023-10-04 20:49:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Discussion of the ethics of AI art belongs in the comments. The claim that AI art is not art is an opinion and does not contradict or refute the original tweet.
Written by 2EDC16132635435EE8AA4187810D90BA2AAECD4EA66D8382AAEFFE450F75D647
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1709013048361386173
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1709672232455127294
- noteId - 1709672232455127294
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2EDC16132635435EE8AA4187810D90BA2AAECD4EA66D8382AAEFFE450F75D647 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696452599049
- tweetId - 1709013048361386173
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN Discussion of the ethics of AI art belongs in the comments. The claim that AI art is not art is an opinion and does not contradict or refute the original tweet.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-04 20:49:59 UTC (1696452599049) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-05 02:47:39 UTC (1696474059718) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-04 19:14:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 18:29:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 18:28:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 17:55:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 16:16:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 16:05:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 14:59:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 05:14:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 05:08:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 04:59:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 04:41:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 04:40:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 02:48:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 02:09:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 01:29:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 01:27:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 01:12:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-05 00:06:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 23:55:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 22:24:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 22:06:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 21:54:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 21:06:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 20:28:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 20:22:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-06 10:57:47 -0500 | Rating Details |