Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-04 16:52:39 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The article doesn't question the legitimacy of the trial. On the contrary, is premise is based on the fact that Trump Org clearly committed fraud. The author is a law consultant, who is questioning the decision of a Supreme Court Justice to apply a certain penalty. https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2023/10/02/dissolution-ordered-in-people-of-the-state-of-new-york-v-trump-appears-unwarranted/

Written by F332117051B218570F8FFE9012DA7FEECDD1DFB50A368E8E45BCDF0BF4DB38AD
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1709612509127164176
• noteId - 1709612509127164176
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - F332117051B218570F8FFE9012DA7FEECDD1DFB50A368E8E45BCDF0BF4DB38AD Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1696438359897
• tweetId - 1709605945859555693
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The article doesn't question the legitimacy of the trial. On the contrary, is premise is based on the fact that Trump Org clearly committed fraud. The author is a law consultant, who is questioning the decision of a Supreme Court Justice to apply a certain penalty. https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2023/10/02/dissolution-ordered-in-people-of-the-state-of-new-york-v-trump-appears-unwarranted/