Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-04 04:11:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Despite the book's assertion that anal sex should always involve water-based lubricants, most proctologists agree that silicone lubricants are at least as good for anal intercourse, except when using sex toys. https://bespokesurgical.com/education/anal-lubrication-practices-2/

Written by 55A94E6B073FD2DD09006D636CF5415C962E8001EF4AE9147E381C3DEA87BAE0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1709049142478037032

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1709420837345042881
  • noteId - 1709420837345042881
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 55A94E6B073FD2DD09006D636CF5415C962E8001EF4AE9147E381C3DEA87BAE0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696392661784
  • tweetId - 1709049142478037032
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Despite the book's assertion that anal sex should always involve water-based lubricants, most proctologists agree that silicone lubricants are at least as good for anal intercourse, except when using sex toys. https://bespokesurgical.com/education/anal-lubrication-practices-2/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-04 04:11:01 UTC
(1696392661784)		 2023-10-04 08:03:06 UTC
(1696406586052)		 CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-10-05 02:47:39 UTC
(1696474059718)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2023-10-04 08:03:06 UTC
(1696406586052)		 CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-04 15:10:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 12:58:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 05:51:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 05:28:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 04:24:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 03:13:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 02:31:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 02:28:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 02:27:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 02:14:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 01:57:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 01:47:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 01:28:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 01:13:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 01:05:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 01:04:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 00:48:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 00:36:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 00:21:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-03 23:59:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-03 23:38:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-03 23:38:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-03 23:31:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-03 23:24:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-03 23:15:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-03 23:14:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-03 23:11:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 13:45:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 11:36:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 02:40:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-04 20:26:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 22:09:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-07 09:17:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-06 19:33:33 -0500 Rating Details