Birdwatch Note
2023-10-03 22:38:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
While yes, there is no official statement saying AI was used, there is also no evidence saying that there wasn't. The phrasing "it does appear" makes this clearly an opinion post. Also, claiming it might be an intentional detail is speculation, which can be done in the replies.
Written by A9749581104CE9B11A6346266CC777C2037619A941B86B7CB535B253D772C19B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1709209355038445767
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1709337088276001063
- noteId - 1709337088276001063
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A9749581104CE9B11A6346266CC777C2037619A941B86B7CB535B253D772C19B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696372694451
- tweetId - 1709209355038445767
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- While yes, there is no official statement saying AI was used, there is also no evidence saying that there wasn't. The phrasing "it does appear" makes this clearly an opinion post. Also, claiming it might be an intentional detail is speculation, which can be done in the replies.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-03 22:38:14 UTC (1696372694451) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-04 02:49:07 UTC (1696387747507) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-03 18:34:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 18:22:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 17:58:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 12:39:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 12:26:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 12:01:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 11:37:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 10:37:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 10:28:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 10:20:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 07:20:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 06:44:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 04:46:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 04:09:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-04 03:24:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 23:28:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 22:29:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 22:15:00 -0500 | Rating Details |