Birdwatch Note
2023-10-02 15:08:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, seems quite clear that no note needed here, it’s simply someone’s opinion, quoting a FC’s statement, which is also their opinion. Hardly misleading.
Written by 01A0BD6EBCC7B7B441B3160CBF0434D86FC04B7393F8396A7A7F884942E8F8A4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1708842502629847085
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1708861547907293624
- noteId - 1708861547907293624
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 01A0BD6EBCC7B7B441B3160CBF0434D86FC04B7393F8396A7A7F884942E8F8A4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696259316793
- tweetId - 1708842502629847085
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN, seems quite clear that no note needed here, it’s simply someone’s opinion, quoting a FC’s statement, which is also their opinion. Hardly misleading.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-02 15:08:36 UTC (1696259316793) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-03 02:49:27 UTC (1696301367088) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-02 18:18:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 17:32:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 17:26:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 13:50:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 12:02:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 12:01:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 11:44:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 11:05:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:56:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:45:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:26:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:19:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:10:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:09:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:09:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 09:28:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 08:45:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 06:50:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 03:10:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 02:21:51 -0500 | Rating Details |