Birdwatch Note
2023-10-02 14:26:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This user is arguing that the offside seen in the attached photo is "dodgy". But it isn't, in fact, dodgy and VAR did a good job rulling it as offside. Source: https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/12954497/was-ten-hag-right-to-be-annoyed-with-offside-decision
Written by 5E3F8BE7A4F9173C112FB5F7A4ADDC8E750988652B75094392F0CC73A9474E46
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1708754987122127138
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1708851055327396252
- noteId - 1708851055327396252
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5E3F8BE7A4F9173C112FB5F7A4ADDC8E750988652B75094392F0CC73A9474E46 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696256815164
- tweetId - 1708754987122127138
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This user is arguing that the offside seen in the attached photo is "dodgy". But it isn't, in fact, dodgy and VAR did a good job rulling it as offside. Source: https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/12954497/was-ten-hag-right-to-be-annoyed-with-offside-decision
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-02 14:26:55 UTC (1696256815164) |
2023-10-02 19:40:19 UTC (1696275619446) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-10-03 02:49:27 UTC (1696301367088) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-10-02 19:40:19 UTC (1696275619446) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-02 18:34:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 18:05:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 13:55:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 12:36:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 12:07:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 11:50:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 11:24:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:56:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:51:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:47:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:45:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:32:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:29:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:26:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:20:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:14:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:13:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:09:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:02:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 10:00:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 09:53:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 09:38:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 14:23:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 02:31:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 02:18:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 01:43:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 01:35:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 01:25:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 22:43:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-02 22:16:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-06 10:20:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-03 02:23:38 -0500 | Rating Details |