Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-02 09:03:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

False, Sheffield United ended in 9th position in the 19/20 season. This is the season when the goal line technology failed during the Aston Villa vs Sheffield United game Source: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/53086360.amp https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019–20_Premier_League

Written by 16D5F89577A07D4CE72910877D34FF718C496089ECB21A95FEA4A40A016C31B5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1708596012414034089

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1708769626601975935
  • noteId - 1708769626601975935
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 16D5F89577A07D4CE72910877D34FF718C496089ECB21A95FEA4A40A016C31B5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696237401044
  • tweetId - 1708596012414034089
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • False, Sheffield United ended in 9th position in the 19/20 season. This is the season when the goal line technology failed during the Aston Villa vs Sheffield United game Source: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/53086360.amp https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019–20_Premier_League

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-02 09:03:21 UTC
(1696237401044)
2023-10-02 21:41:07 UTC
(1696282867633)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-03 02:49:27 UTC
(1696301367088)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-02 21:41:07 UTC
(1696282867633)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-02 16:47:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 13:17:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 08:59:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 08:55:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 08:28:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 07:32:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 07:06:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 06:52:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 06:40:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 06:24:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 05:51:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 05:32:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 05:07:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 04:09:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 04:08:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 04:05:51 -0500 Rating Details