Birdwatch Note
2023-10-02 07:02:10 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
One of the proposed notes is pure speculation, and another completely misses the point of the study (they were testing for prior bias or prejudice, not "forgetting to take into account". As the other notes point out this is also true even if no study was directly cited NNN
Written by 19ABE1882708B0C214C361114CEEEE35C62FB9369F23760DE1DDA07C1BD166C6
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1707790820684808588
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1708739133462434179
- noteId - 1708739133462434179
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 19ABE1882708B0C214C361114CEEEE35C62FB9369F23760DE1DDA07C1BD166C6 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696230130910
- tweetId - 1707790820684808588
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- One of the proposed notes is pure speculation, and another completely misses the point of the study (they were testing for prior bias or prejudice, not "forgetting to take into account". As the other notes point out this is also true even if no study was directly cited NNN
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-02 07:02:10 UTC (1696230130910) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-03 02:49:27 UTC (1696301367088) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-02 15:55:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 14:42:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 12:37:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 11:23:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 09:46:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 09:44:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 09:09:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 07:29:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 05:20:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 03:32:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-01 23:43:46 -0500 | Rating Details |