Birdwatch Note
2023-10-01 22:30:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Tal y como aparece en la propia imagen, ambas sustancias se diferencian en más que un átomo. Le faltarían, además del nitrogeno, 5 atomos de carbono, 7 de oxigeno, un benceno y un azabiciclo. Por otra parte, lo cierto es que hay papers hablando del caracter adictivo de ambas: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1931610/
Written by 5DA3B503D749AE7FF120F54CCAFB3CD4C134BD36718785838032307B88E4929B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1708506146284204431
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1708610444754133006
- noteId - 1708610444754133006
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5DA3B503D749AE7FF120F54CCAFB3CD4C134BD36718785838032307B88E4929B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696199449128
- tweetId - 1708506146284204431
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Tal y como aparece en la propia imagen, ambas sustancias se diferencian en más que un átomo. Le faltarían, además del nitrogeno, 5 atomos de carbono, 7 de oxigeno, un benceno y un azabiciclo. Por otra parte, lo cierto es que hay papers hablando del caracter adictivo de ambas: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1931610/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-01 22:30:49 UTC (1696199449128) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-02 02:19:04 UTC (1696213144709) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-01 18:39:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 17:34:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 17:22:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 16:59:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 08:01:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 07:06:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 03:30:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 03:12:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 03:07:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 01:36:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-03 18:19:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-03 09:02:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-03 07:57:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-03 05:09:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-03 03:42:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-03 01:10:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-03 00:58:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 21:12:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-04 02:23:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 18:27:24 -0500 | Rating Details |