Birdwatch Note
2023-10-01 19:27:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, l’article ne proclame pas que l’employeur est dans la légalité.
Written by B7BBEA2CD979617B0AE365521F441A175EA28806CC9ABD8ADF0221332042706F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1708504292011786325
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1708564246680797681
- noteId - 1708564246680797681
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B7BBEA2CD979617B0AE365521F441A175EA28806CC9ABD8ADF0221332042706F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696188434658
- tweetId - 1708504292011786325
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN, l’article ne proclame pas que l’employeur est dans la légalité.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-01 19:27:14 UTC (1696188434658) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-02 02:19:04 UTC (1696213144709) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-01 19:23:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-01 16:09:35 -0500 | Rating Details |