Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-01 17:23:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no mathematical rule that makes it impossible for different samples to have widely different outcomes if the group being sampled are different. Propability distribution only apply when the sample is random. Twitter sample is not random but highly selected. https://www.insidescience.org/news/visualizing-twitter-echo-chambers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_probability_distribution

Written by F461064D2FE2105E2E1E850EE5477A6279B14D5F66D3BF5148957FF376257BAF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1708470039395893492

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1708533197619802467
  • noteId - 1708533197619802467
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F461064D2FE2105E2E1E850EE5477A6279B14D5F66D3BF5148957FF376257BAF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696181031986
  • tweetId - 1708470039395893492
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is no mathematical rule that makes it impossible for different samples to have widely different outcomes if the group being sampled are different. Propability distribution only apply when the sample is random. Twitter sample is not random but highly selected. https://www.insidescience.org/news/visualizing-twitter-echo-chambers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_probability_distribution

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-01 17:23:51 UTC
(1696181031986)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-02 02:19:04 UTC
(1696213144709)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-01 17:56:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 17:42:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 17:18:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 17:17:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 17:14:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 16:56:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 16:40:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 16:22:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 16:16:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 15:12:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 15:05:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 14:25:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 14:12:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 14:12:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 14:07:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 14:02:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 13:49:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 13:28:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 13:26:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 13:23:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 13:18:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 13:17:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 13:15:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 12:52:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 12:35:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 07:41:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 03:47:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 01:42:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 01:09:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 22:51:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-01 21:47:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 19:39:08 -0500 Rating Details