Birdwatch Note
2023-10-01 14:29:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Obwohl Plastik kein organischer Stoff ist, können Schimmelsporen auf seiner Oberfläche wachsen, insbesondere wenn es Schmutz, organische Materialreste oder Feuchtigkeit gibt. Die Oberfläche von Plastik kann Schimmelsporen fangen und ihnen einen Ort zum Keimen bieten. https://verywellhome.com/can-mold-grow-on-plastic/
Written by 0D5CA7B25CAAEB10FC4D6240D1A5F46387439DF0FB698730A4A54CAE424DC951
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1708433732120519099
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1708489219260232048
- noteId - 1708489219260232048
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0D5CA7B25CAAEB10FC4D6240D1A5F46387439DF0FB698730A4A54CAE424DC951 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1696170546726
- tweetId - 1708433732120519099
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Obwohl Plastik kein organischer Stoff ist, können Schimmelsporen auf seiner Oberfläche wachsen, insbesondere wenn es Schmutz, organische Materialreste oder Feuchtigkeit gibt. Die Oberfläche von Plastik kann Schimmelsporen fangen und ihnen einen Ort zum Keimen bieten. https://verywellhome.com/can-mold-grow-on-plastic/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-01 14:29:06 UTC (1696170546726) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-02 02:19:04 UTC (1696213144709) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-01 17:08:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 16:27:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 16:03:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 15:42:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 15:15:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 13:16:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 12:13:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 12:08:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 11:21:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 10:41:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 09:54:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 09:52:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 09:40:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-01 09:31:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 09:48:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 06:39:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 00:37:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 00:30:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-03 06:05:01 -0500 | Rating Details |