Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-29 18:27:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Paula London did not mention on what occasion Sangita broke OFCOM rules so how can the poster deny that she has.

Written by 6A654E580EC14236DDAFB86F3FCDE11CCA81B040C5EF49DC1F0AF150232F09A4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1707768772080148560

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1707824430372594166
  • noteId - 1707824430372594166
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6A654E580EC14236DDAFB86F3FCDE11CCA81B040C5EF49DC1F0AF150232F09A4 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696012048701
  • tweetId - 1707768772080148560
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Paula London did not mention on what occasion Sangita broke OFCOM rules so how can the poster deny that she has.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-29 18:27:28 UTC
(1696012048701)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-30 03:41:20 UTC
(1696045280525)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-29 18:14:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 16:10:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 15:47:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 15:33:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 15:20:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 15:13:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 14:48:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 14:35:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 14:29:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 14:23:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 14:01:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 13:48:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 13:30:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-30 00:04:37 -0500 Rating Details