Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-28 17:23:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This post takes Professor Turley’s statement out of context. A review of Turley’s full statement shows he goes on to state that the impeachment inquiry IS needed to establish evidence for a formal impeachment. Live coverage here: https://www.YouTube.com/live/UbNeM_H7P60?si=wz4g2eirLzX-jWAa

Written by EDF1D72687B119FCDFD42054622046B2ABC2450C87AFE328E531B649496D93DD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1707410295298138183

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1707445863306465404
  • noteId - 1707445863306465404
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - EDF1D72687B119FCDFD42054622046B2ABC2450C87AFE328E531B649496D93DD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1695921791273
  • tweetId - 1707410295298138183
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This post takes Professor Turley’s statement out of context. A review of Turley’s full statement shows he goes on to state that the impeachment inquiry IS needed to establish evidence for a formal impeachment. Live coverage here: https://www.YouTube.com/live/UbNeM_H7P60?si=wz4g2eirLzX-jWAa

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-28 17:23:11 UTC
(1695921791273)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-29 02:40:19 UTC
(1695955219748)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-28 19:29:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 19:14:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 19:07:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 18:55:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 18:00:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 16:22:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 16:03:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 15:53:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 15:09:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 15:04:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 14:59:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 14:48:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 14:37:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 14:30:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 14:20:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 14:12:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 14:01:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 13:51:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 13:27:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 13:03:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 13:00:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 12:57:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 12:48:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 12:38:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 12:35:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 12:27:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 12:26:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 12:24:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 09:25:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 08:53:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 08:39:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 04:14:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 01:46:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 01:19:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 23:30:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 21:01:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 19:57:34 -0500 Rating Details